• Registration is disabled due to constant spammers. Email [email protected] and we will temporarily re-enable registration for you.

Offseason

SandS2910

Well-Known Member
Bummer, I enjoyed my SJSU Spartans.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe we can revive it by making a new league...

I thought of some new rules:

*Historically bad teams only
*No restrictions on coaching XP
(if CPU can go crazy, why can't we?)
*No custom playbooks offensive or defensive
*Sim play


Down to what the game was to begin with. It will show who the real "King" of this game is.

Sent from my XT1031 using Tapatalk
 

guardman23

Well-Known Member
Maybe we can revive it by making a new league...

I thought of some new rules:

*Historically bad teams only
*No restrictions on coaching XP
(if CPU can go crazy, why can't we?)
*No custom playbooks offensive or defensive
*Sim play


Down to what the game was to begin with. It will show who the real "King" of this game is.

Sent from my XT1031 using Tapatalk
Am down for this
 

Toctsx112311

Active Member
Maybe we can revive it by making a new league...

I thought of some new rules:

*Historically bad teams only
*No restrictions on coaching XP
(if CPU can go crazy, why can't we?)
*No custom playbooks offensive or defensive
*Sim play


Down to what the game was to begin with. It will show who the real "King" of this game is.

Sent from my XT1031 using Tapatalk
We can always start a new one but my only issue is the Non restricted XP. Whatever amount of XP we get trumps the cpu. I rather enjoy the tougher recruiting n feel it makes for a more even field users n cpu teams.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

NavyHog

Well-Known Member
Utopia Moderator
NCAA Moderator
We can always start a new one but my only issue is the Non restricted XP. Whatever amount of XP we get trumps the cpu. I rather enjoy the tougher recruiting n feel it makes for a more even field users n cpu teams.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not bad ideas, but I can only do 2.
 

SandS2910

Well-Known Member
We can always start a new one but my only issue is the Non restricted XP. Whatever amount of XP we get trumps the cpu. I rather enjoy the tougher recruiting n feel it makes for a more even field users n cpu teams.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It can still be tough. XP set to slow and still the same restrictions for the amount of players that can be recruited.

Sent from my XT1031 using Tapatalk
 

NavyHog

Well-Known Member
Utopia Moderator
NCAA Moderator
It can still be tough. XP set to slow and still the same restrictions for the amount of players that can be recruited.

Sent from my XT1031 using Tapatalk

Problem with that is if you add new people they get the glitch where they don't gain XP. So if you make it unlimited you will always have some guys hopelessly behind.
 

SandS2910

Well-Known Member
Problem with that is if you add new people they get the glitch where they don't gain XP. So if you make it unlimited you will always have some guys hopelessly behind.
So where would you set the limit? 15 is a good number. Or nothing.

Sent from my XT1031 using Tapatalk
 

SandS2910

Well-Known Member
Here are historically bad teams:

NMSU
IDAHO
UAB-guardman23
UTEP-Highlander424
RICE
KENT STATE
BUFFALO-SandS2910
EMU
UL Lafayette
UL Monroe


Sent from my XT1031 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Top