And that's where the BCS went wrong. It was perfect between 1998 and 2004. The whining of USC and its' supporters were what prompted the switch to the human polls weighing twice as much as the computers.
-YTC
Who in the world thinks the BCS was perfect in all of its' selections? It was far from infallible, as evidenced by the debacle of the 2011 season. The point is that, with the BCS, you never had to worry about more than 2 undeserving teams getting a shot at the shampship. Every other system has a number higher than that. Therefore, no other system placed the importance on the regular season that the BCS did.
Now, you can lose to 4-8 teams, lose by a billion points, or lose to your rival by double digits in the last game of the regular season and still be in contention for the shampship. IMO, that's awful, and it's an awful thing for how awesome the regular season in CFB is.
-YTC
Truly a PERFECT system