I know @bruin228 wants CSU and @ClevelandFan wants to play Penn State.
-
Registration is disabled due to constant spammers. Email [email protected] and we will temporarily re-enable registration for you.
2021 schedule requests
- Thread starter NavyHog
- Start date
ClevelandFan
Active Member
This past year I played Kansas State & Colorado, both at home.
The year before last I also played Kansas State, I believe at a neutral site. Since I've already played Kansas State twice now, it'd be cool to play another Big 12 user.
Any CPU OOC games I have, please make them a ranked team.
Penn State I should play automatically if you move them back into my division (take out Indiana or Purdue).
Also, the division with Notre Dame needs another user.
The year before last I also played Kansas State, I believe at a neutral site. Since I've already played Kansas State twice now, it'd be cool to play another Big 12 user.
Any CPU OOC games I have, please make them a ranked team.
Penn State I should play automatically if you move them back into my division (take out Indiana or Purdue).
Also, the division with Notre Dame needs another user.
Dakota2147
Active Member
Texas Tech is available to travel to Columbus this year. (Preferably not one of the first weeks)
I forgot we get four OOC games, so if SC is ranked, give me them
If not, whatever highest ranked team
ClevelandFan
Active Member
I'd also like to make a general request for everyone's schedule.
I think it'd be best if you could avoid scheduling Big 12 users against Big 10 CPUs and vice versa (avoid scheduling Big 10 users against Big 12 CPUs) as much as possible.
For instance, I noticed the last couple years that Michigan played several Big 12 user teams. This obviously hurts the strength of schedule for every Big 10 team.
Basically, I'm just trying to avoid a messed up situation like last season where a team with 3 losses was ranked ahead of a team with 1 loss (not to mention a team with 2 losses that beat them H2H). If every Big 12 user is beating up on Big 10 CPUs, that skews the scales.
Not trying to be a pain in the ass, but this kind of stuff clearly matters with the rankings.
I think it'd be best if you could avoid scheduling Big 12 users against Big 10 CPUs and vice versa (avoid scheduling Big 10 users against Big 12 CPUs) as much as possible.
For instance, I noticed the last couple years that Michigan played several Big 12 user teams. This obviously hurts the strength of schedule for every Big 10 team.
Basically, I'm just trying to avoid a messed up situation like last season where a team with 3 losses was ranked ahead of a team with 1 loss (not to mention a team with 2 losses that beat them H2H). If every Big 12 user is beating up on Big 10 CPUs, that skews the scales.
Not trying to be a pain in the ass, but this kind of stuff clearly matters with the rankings.
@Flanntastic I'm guessing you are enjoying your NCAA retirement. A lot of new guys to beat up on if your still froggy.
With 4 users your SOS should go up. I also think that no matter what we do the EA rankings logic will always be slightly FUBAR.
ClevelandFan
Active Member
Yeah, having more users in the Big 10 will help with that for sure as well.
UofIHawkeyee
Member
I would request a rivalry with Texas a&m or Norte Dame or Michigan State. Maybe start the season off week 1 with a user team. Also around week 6-7 a home ranked game against cpu or user
UofIHawkeyee
Member
Or Kansas State