Outside containment must not be part of Pelini's defensive philosophy. That aside, I predict we lose to Iowa next week.
start studying press conference tapes.Energetic, articulate coaches with a set identity and philosophy. That should be the goal.
I feel like in the current state of CFB, this is as good as Nebraska is going to be, except for an occasional blessed year where they have 2 losses and win the CCG. National title contention is probably behind them. Conf title contention will probably be a yearly possibility, but only because they are in the weaker of the two divisions. This is as far as they can take their situation now.
The only thing that can probably change that is:
1) A top coach that falls in their lap and gets more than you would expect from Nebraska natural resources.
2) Changes to CFB that allows teams to pay players (where the Big Ten has an advantage).
I don't see either of the two coming soon enough. 3-5 losses is the norm now for Nebraska, where they drop at least as many big games as they win.
That was an unemotional and honest assessment, not whining.Geez, stop sounding so defeated.
If Baylor, fucking Baylor, can find a coach who can make them relevant, then Nebraska can do it too.
That was an unemotional and honest assessment, not whining.
Baylor is in the middle of the best recruiting area of the nation. When Baylor finally decided to take football seriously and put some money into the program (including marketing) they were finally able to tap into their superior natural resources comapared to Nebraska. Nebraska's "tradition capital" ran out over the past decade, it's used up and young players don't really see us as a tier I destination anymore. You may not know how Nebraska built and maintained their success in previous decades. If you are familiar with it you might see that the system they used before is not likely to be repeated in the current CFB landscape. Very different times back then.
You will also notice I said one of the two things that could reverse this would be a top flight coach.
When Colorado won their title in 1990, their whole backfield was from the Los Angeles area.
And when they were winning titles in the 90's, a lot of their stars came from far away, no? Lawrence Philips was from California and Tommy Frazier was from Florida. When you're a nationally known brand, kids flock to you, location be dared. When Colorado won their title in 1990, their whole backfield was from the Los Angeles area. These are kids that you'd think would have attended USC/UCLA or another Pac-10 school, but because Colorado under McCartney was a hot program at the time, they went out there.
Also, I didn't know Illinois and Indiana were recruiting hotbeds.
In fairness, they went to CU because they were all fleeing warrants for their arrest.
I think Nebraska is in the same boat with Notre Dame, Michigan, Oklahoma, and other colder-weather schools that still managed to build a name brand and history and exceed expectations based on the "natural resources" of their locations. In my view, all it really takes is that one outstanding coach to start winning, which draws more players, which increases the brand name power, which draws more money and resources, etc. Every big-time program that falls on hard times has similar laments about the "difficulty winning in today's CFB landscape," when the primary culprit is generally a piss-poor coach (or an unfortunate series of them) that has eroded the cachet of the program and infused the culture of the program with that sense of malaise and faded glory. Heck, I felt the same way about USC in the 90's, and I'm sure Notre Dame fans felt that way during the Willingham/Weis years.
Also, please elaborate on the bolded. I am curious.
So, Nebraska did just enough to win today. I am glad we beat Iowa...well, because fuck Iowa.
I am sure we will keep Pelini and we can look forward to another 9-4 season in 2015.
So, Nebraska did just enough to win today. I am glad we beat Iowa...well, because fuck Iowa.
I am sure we will keep Pelini and we can look forward to another 9-4 season in 2015.
Yeah it looks like some of the players are pretty upset. Not surprising at all, everyone knew he was well liked by players.
Players should shut the fuck up and play better if they want Pelini to stay their coach. Their implosion against Wisconsin was ridiculous. Losing to Minnesota, ugh. Nebraska really should have been 11-1 and playing Ohio State in the championship game. Or at least 10-2.
I can see why players would be upset, but ultimately they have a lot of responsibility for coaches being fired.
Plz buy mccelwein... plz plz plz.
Mullen would leave MSU because it's MSU. He's probably hit the ceiling there. Plus, last year he was on the hot seat. He might want to strike while the iron is hot.
Meh the chance to be a power in SEC country vs Lincoln? I could see him bolting to Gainsville. I'd be really surprised if he bolts to Lincoln.
The Associated Press getting to the bottom of the real story here.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8562...op25&utm_source=SocialFlow&utm_medium=Twitter
MSU is never going to be a power in the SEC, especially in that division. Unless the programs at Alabama, Auburn, LSU, Arkansas, and, heck, Daddy A&M, get wiped out. Mullen could throw together a bunch of 10 win seasons and be a god at MSU, but they're never going to be competing year in and year out with those programs. It's historically a below .500 program. If Mullen wants to move to an elite program, he should do it now.