It's going to be all on skeet again i think. Be home in 15ish and I'll stop the hold up. Want to watch
Not according to my gf, who apparently is breaking up with me at this moment. So I can actually watch the livesim.wendell comin hard and pissed for game 7
Whatever the rule thread states. I'm pretty sure i opened the floor to changing the requirements for the 490k years but nobody wanted to talk. Right now i think every year of the extension has to be over estimate and no more than 5 yearsHey @OU11
Got a contract question
If I've got a guy who is on 490k for the 2050 season and then entering arbitration in the 2051 season, can I sign him to an extension now at his projected arb rate? (lets say it hypothetically $1.5 Million On that extension, as long as I structure the arb years as at least the listed arb amount that's good, right? What about the 2050 season when he was only supposed to be making 490k? Can I, for instance, offer him $1Million in 2050 and then $1.5Million in 2051 and after?
Hey @OU11
Got a contract question
If I've got a guy who is on 490k for the 2050 season and then entering arbitration in the 2051 season, can I sign him to an extension now at his projected arb rate? (lets say it hypothetically $1.5 Million On that extension, as long as I structure the arb years as at least the listed arb amount that's good, right? What about the 2050 season when he was only supposed to be making 490k? Can I, for instance, offer him $1Million in 2050 and then $1.5Million in 2051 and after?
It doesnt differentiate, no.The rule thread didn't state the part about the 490k years, which is why I was wonderin.
The contract rules are over my head. I don't know what I'm doing, so I'm just gonna go with what I want until I get caught cheating.
Blame Rad offering extensions to guys 11 days into their careers.
I also saw a highly illegal contract signed this year didn't say anything about it. Don't want to Rad it.
That's why i did it originally. The earlier you sign them the lower the price. So paying the minimum year is a downside to balance the upside of keeping his next 4 possibly lowerCool, I'll just take advantage of his last $490k year then and see how he plays since there isn't too much incentive if I have to hit his arb estimate this season.
Definitely should be, pitchers you could sell me on but not batters. I could have signed haamid so cheap for 8 years but i didnt because it was outlawedThe contracts that I did aren't even that great; if Pendragon had blown out his shoulder instead of Vasquez I'd be out 30+ million. I might save like 10-15 million if Pendo hits potential.
In hindsight it shouldn't even be a rule.