Hopefully at some point those issues work themselves out.
I'm okay with limiting users to 500 points on recruits that have user v user competition if everyone else is. Not sure how it could be enforced but hopefully it would work out.
I do my recruiting on my IPAD which I find easier. It's quicker to scroll each individual recruit and determine if I'm gaining or losing. If you and I are even on a recruit, and our bonus is 300 each, if I put 500 on someone and you are +100 then I know you used 600.
Its kind of a honor system idea, but I do have a way of figuring it out if it's against me.
I'm not taking my points off players until everyone agrees to it because I'm competing with other users who do have the full 600 available to them and I'm not losing ground putting 500 on them when I have no idea if they are or aren't.
Im fine with that house rule, but until it becomes official and everyone is agreeing to it, I am keeping my points on there.
If we just want to make it so you only use 500 against the people with XP problems but can go up to the full amount vs people who don't, that's fine with me as well.
Not going to name names @TXHusker05 @Flanntastic, but there are still people putting 600 points on players. How do I know?
Exhibit A) DT-Daniels:
- My team bonus is 320 (because everyone wants to be a Miner) and I put 500 points toward him.
- The other team bonus is 300 and they must have put 600 points toward him so I ended up -80 for the week
In summary 500 + 320 = 820, 600 + 300 = 900
820-900 = - 80 deficit for this guy.
This happened to 3 different recruits. Please ensure you take a look at who you are recruiting and if it's against UTEP, ULM or ECU then only do 500 pts.
I can't help it that I was Munsoned by the commish.
I got a idea, how about if we make any rules, we tag everybody, as i never saw this thread till today. secondly, it would be cool if I would have known that when i put my XP points towards that skill and none on visits. Thirdly if it just affects Navy then fuckem, his team is already too good.Not going to name names @TXHusker05 @Flanntastic, but there are still people putting 600 points on players. How do I know?
Exhibit A) DT-Daniels:
- My team bonus is 320 (because everyone wants to be a Miner) and I put 500 points toward him.
- The other team bonus is 300 and they must have put 600 points toward him so I ended up -80 for the week
In summary 500 + 320 = 820, 600 + 300 = 900
820-900 = - 80 deficit for this guy.
This happened to 3 different recruits. Please ensure you take a look at who you are recruiting and if it's against UTEP, ULM or ECU then only do 500 pts.
I can't help it that I was Munsoned by the commish.
I got a idea, how about if we make any rules, we tag everybody, as i never saw this thread till today. secondly, it would be cool if I would have known that when i put my XP points towards that skill and none on visits. Thirdly if it just affects Navy then fuckem, his team is already too good.
I got a idea, how about if we make any rules, we tag everybody, as i never saw this thread till today. secondly, it would be cool if I would have known that when i put my XP points towards that skill and none on visits. Thirdly if it just affects Navy then fuckem, his team is already too good.
It affects 3, probably 4 teams, 2 of which are new guys.
I've tagged everyone now so everyone is responsible for knowing the new "rule" for this season. If you are caught breaking it, I'll start taking away scholarships.
Yes, I understood you perfectly which is why I said I was fine with that... But I am NOT doing it until it is agreed upon by everyone.
Flann never participated in this thread, nor did Ram for that matter. Until now, I'm not sure either even knew this was being discussed, never mind actually set as a rule. There are multiple recruits who have more than just 2 users competing, including the recruit you used as an example. I was not going to drop down to 500 on a recruit just because UTEP was in on him only to get bypassed by Flann or Ram who most likely were still putting 600 on the same recruit, which it turns out was the case.
I got a idea, how about if we make any rules, we tag everybody, as i never saw this thread till today. secondly, it would be cool if I would have known that when i put my XP points towards that skill and none on visits. Thirdly if it just affects Navy then fuckem, his team is already too good.
Your're my boy Tx, but you for real? Man this isn't rocket science . If you are against UTEP, ULM or ECU, who through no fault of their own have very limited ability to scout, and are restricted to 5,000 pts per week and 500 pts per recruit, then you and any other team can only use 500 points. The fact that I have such a talented team is irrelevant. It isn't just about me it's for @LEGEND and @Walter323 as well who have less talented teams than NIU.
You guys that have played in my leagues in the past know that I'm all about making things fair for everyone. In last years MAC conference I implemented a sliding scholarship scale which gave the conference winners less than those that came in last (which hurt me the most). I'm the one who recommended to Flann to pause at edit conference so we could zero out OC/DC so that everyone is level.
Last but not least from what I can tell we are only going head to head on 2-3 recruits. And I would say my, or any other team, is out of the running for a player if we haven't offered a scholarship and/or have fallen behind by 1000 points.
I'm going to tag this for @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic @Flanntastic
Can you read? "not only am I limited to 500 points any time UTEP is on a recruiting board" No. You are limited when UTEP is in the top 5 and within 1,000 points of you.
I must have gotten a new DC, but sure, I'll gladly take scholarships away from myself if you're going to be a huge baby about all of this (to no one's surprise) and flagrantly break the rules.