Wooly
Well-Known Member
Gotcha.We can't because most people on steam get auto updates.
Gotcha.We can't because most people on steam get auto updates.
Quit it.League Parity went out the window a long time ago with IFA but I was just a boy crying wolf and then also being a wolf by signing IFAs
Greatest season in league history?
It was last I checked, since it's the MLB rule
That rule predates you, homie.so all the shit that was thrown at me for giving a legal contract to miguel chavez that basically made that fucking rule, and then it gets overturned?
lol
That rule predates you, homie.
Carrier, Zo, BugMaybe there's been another 10 WARS WON season by a batter, but I don't remember it
Creswell came close with a 9.9 season in 2063.Maybe there's been another 10 WARS WON season by a batter, but I don't remember it
I'm pretty surprised Bucky signed that deal, even though I should've because indy devs. Requero required 8M per and would only go 5 years and he's 20% as good by WAR.
Oh fo sho it was.Well it sure wasn't in the league when i joined homie
Oh fo sho it was.
Wait, that deal is still illegal I think. It alternates between 9M and 6M, and we at least used to have a rule where we couldn't go backwards during arb years. I don't think we removed that last time around
[xtable=skin1|cellpadding:0|cellspacing:0|50x@]
{tbody}
{tr}
{td}CF{/td}
{td}César Pérez{/td}
{td}25{/td}
{td}$490k(O){/td}
{td}$3.6m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
Punished? Are you six? Should we punish the tattle-tales too?At this point I really don't fucking care. Wooly is the same shithead that keeps leaving guys pushing 30 and over 30 in A and doesn't get punished. Time to go dormant and really not give a fuck.
Don't forget Phillip Oort's 2034 NL Pennant winning season with Istanbul!Carrier, Zo, Bug
Punished? Are you six? Should we punish the tattle-tales too?
Wait, that deal is still illegal I think. It alternates between 9M and 6M, and we at least used to have a rule where we couldn't go backwards during arb years. I don't think we removed that last time around
[xtable=cellpadding:0|cellspacing:0|968x@]
{tbody}
{tr}
{td}CF{/td}
{td}César Pérez{/td}
{td}25{/td}
{td}$490k(O){/td}
{td}$3.6m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
Will you punish me when i release my entire team next sim?
ARB CONTRACTS
Pre-arbitration extensions must wait until the player has one year of service time and must at least be equal to the arbitration estimate.
If a player has gone through an arbitration hearing, the salary of each future arbitration eligible year must be equal to or greater than the amount awarded to the player.
No first rounders in a salary dump
No future cash in a trade
Wolfman doesn't even remember rad playingSorry @Orlando
I gotta go with @Wolfman21 on this one. I remember @doh railing against @Mr. Radpants' extensions.
Will you punish me when i release my entire team next sim?
Well you'll have to ask real nicely to come back in
don't do that fuckshit. If you're gonna quit, quit....but don't be dumb bout it
Has someone really released their entire time in a fit before? This is a serious question.
I'll just stop pulling your exports. Same result I guess.Will you punish me when i release my entire team next sim?
There is ZERO chance he'd get $6M in ARB and this fuckstick is doing this for IFA purposes. If this contract stands I'm done.
Wolfman doesn't even remember rad playing
Before I go, Wooly should produce a screenshot showing that Bucky was estimated for 3.6M in arb for 2067, which I find impossible.
lawd. You wrong. Just admit it. I gave miguel chavez an extended contract and was railed against because of it but nothing was ever done because it wasn't a fucking instated rule. So other people, seeing the way it could break the game, began doing it. At that point, doh started bitching about it and a rule of 5 years for pre-arb was instated which was stopped this past season for some fucking reason. And now here we are bitching about it again because Wooly has what looks like the best player in the league at 25 y/o for ~7mm aav over the next 10 years, lol
I'll just stop pulling your exports. Same result I guess.
Now you all know why I caved on the @doh rule, so I could piece the fuck out and watch the whole thing burn.
This happened in the UBL if it wasn't a rule the bitching and gaming started long before you.lawd. You wrong. Just admit it. I gave miguel chavez an extended contract and was railed against because of it but nothing was ever done because it wasn't a fucking instated rule. So other people, seeing the way it could break the game, began doing it. At that point, doh started bitching about it and a rule of 5 years for pre-arb was instated which was stopped this past season for some fucking reason. And now here we are bitching about it again because Wooly has what looks like the best player in the league at 25 y/o for ~7mm aav over the next 10 years, lol
@Mr. Radpants life happens, so I must have forgot, but
I think this was going to be the rule as long as 18 functioned like 17. It's a compromise, but we can discuss it further if you want.
I prefer lifting the length clause after a year, but life is all about compromise
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Isn't that what we are doing?
Yea I think so
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Do we need salary to equal arb or aav?
AAV right, or better yet whatever they will take.
In the past it's been each year is greater or equal to arb estimate. I don't mind that part because it protects against the random 10/$10m deal. AAV is fine though.
This happened in the UBL if it wasn't a rule the bitching and gaming started long before you.
Random but I think I've posted about this before: the signing of pre-arb long term contracts is a complete joke. Just an example: look at the deal for Chavez on Kabul.
The unanimous thing is a joke because it never happens. We have made plenty of changes without a unanimous decision. Recently we changed the DL rules and we changed the lamb to 7 games. There are others as well. Commishes also make changes for what we hope is the good of the league. We felt the AI had developed enough not for this to be a problem. Quite a few GMs chimed in, no one really opposed even after I said I'd wait. I forgot after that and still no one chimed in with real concern.The individual rule doesn't frustrate me as much - although clearly we have to change it again - it's the way in which it was handled.
Any time a rule gets brought up, we are told that it has to be unanimous to pass. Well here's the discussion for the changed rule:
Only three GMs participate and there's no vote.
Just frustrating when there isn't consistency, just like with anything else.
Wat have I missed
Wait, that deal is still illegal I think. It alternates between 9M and 6M, and we at least used to have a rule where we couldn't go backwards during arb years. I don't think we removed that last time around
[xtable=cellpadding:0|cellspacing:0|968x@]
{tbody}
{tr}
{td}CF{/td}
{td}César Pérez{/td}
{td}25{/td}
{td}$490k(O){/td}
{td}$3.6m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{td}$9.0m{/td}
{td}$6.0m{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
Wat have I missed