Walter323
Well-Known Member
I'm a house cat, wouldn't do good out in the wild anymoreHey!
In the social media age... you gotta have em! It's amazing how easy it is to get laid in this social media age!
Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk
-
Registration is disabled due to constant spammers. Email [email protected] and we will temporarily re-enable registration for you.
Offseason
- Thread starter Walter323
- Start date
I'll do mine in 30 minutes when I get home.
I've tried loading the OD website on my phone and it won't work. Just a white page.
I've tried loading the OD website on my phone and it won't work. Just a white page.
Never mind I'm ready to go. Got it to load on my iPad. Only one player tried leaving and I successfully talked him back.
I'm good to go @Walter323
I'm good to go @Walter323
Walter323
Well-Known Member
Yes as long as he isn't projected in round 1
JSU Zack
How do I IT?
Round 7 Sophomore Lulz
Walter323
Well-Known Member
We are a players leaving dubba
Walter323
Well-Known Member
Wpotty
Active Member
Walter323
Well-Known Member
Nope. Nobody going pro either
green
I've used 10 scholarships coming into the off-season, added two players since my last update in the recruiting thread. 4* #3 DE Aaron Price 79 OVR and 2* #140 JUCO G Ben Russell 76 OVR. That leaves me 9 open spots. I only have 9 players left on my board and I won't sign all of them so no shot of me going over.
I'm green.
I'm green.
Walter323
Well-Known Member
Would be a good idea to clear your board. You will have walk ons but can cut those later
What he said.
So while we wait for @bruin228 @JSU Zack @SandS2910 and @Akecheta, how are we going to do the divisions for next season? @Walter323
Are we still rolling with the promotion-relegation idea or scrapping it?
[xtable=skin1]
{tbody}
{tr}
{th}Big Ten (Top ){/th}
{th}Conf{/th}
{th}Overall{/th}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#3 Ohio State{/td}
{td}9-1{/td}
{td}13-1{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#6 Tennessee{/td}
{td}7-2{/td}
{td}11-2{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#7 Georgia{/td}
{td}7-2{/td}
{td}11-2{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#5 Arkansas{/td}
{td}7-2{/td}
{td}11-2{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#22 Nebraska{/td}
{td}6-3{/td}
{td}9-4{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
California{/td}
{td}2-7{/td}
{td}4-8{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{th}Big Ten (Bottom){/th}
{th}Conf{/th}
{th}Overall{/th}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#19 Baylor{/td}
{td}6-4{/td}
{td}10-4{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td} Michigan{/td}
{td}4-5{/td}
{td}7-6{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td} Arizona{/td}
{td}3-6{/td}
{td}5-7{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td} Louisville{/td}
{td}2-7{/td}
{td}5-7{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
Notre Dame{/td}
{td}2-7{/td}
{td}4-8{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td} USC{/td}
{td}0-9{/td}
{td}0-12{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
Plus #1 14-0 Texas, 8-5 Iowa State, 9-4 Alabama, 5-7 UCLA. I think relegation would put Baylor and Texas up top, Nebraska and Cal down and the remaining out of conference teams down. Or are we just going to skip that idea entirely?
I'm good with anything but wouldn't mind seeing the 99 OVR teams more evenly distributed.
Are we still rolling with the promotion-relegation idea or scrapping it?
[xtable=skin1]
{tbody}
{tr}
{th}Big Ten (Top ){/th}
{th}Conf{/th}
{th}Overall{/th}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#3 Ohio State{/td}
{td}9-1{/td}
{td}13-1{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#6 Tennessee{/td}
{td}7-2{/td}
{td}11-2{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#7 Georgia{/td}
{td}7-2{/td}
{td}11-2{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#5 Arkansas{/td}
{td}7-2{/td}
{td}11-2{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#22 Nebraska{/td}
{td}6-3{/td}
{td}9-4{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
California{/td}
{td}2-7{/td}
{td}4-8{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{th}Big Ten (Bottom){/th}
{th}Conf{/th}
{th}Overall{/th}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
#19 Baylor{/td}
{td}6-4{/td}
{td}10-4{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td} Michigan{/td}
{td}4-5{/td}
{td}7-6{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td} Arizona{/td}
{td}3-6{/td}
{td}5-7{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td} Louisville{/td}
{td}2-7{/td}
{td}5-7{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td}
Notre Dame{/td}
{td}2-7{/td}
{td}4-8{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td} USC{/td}
{td}0-9{/td}
{td}0-12{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
Plus #1 14-0 Texas, 8-5 Iowa State, 9-4 Alabama, 5-7 UCLA. I think relegation would put Baylor and Texas up top, Nebraska and Cal down and the remaining out of conference teams down. Or are we just going to skip that idea entirely?
I'm good with anything but wouldn't mind seeing the 99 OVR teams more evenly distributed.
Walter323
Well-Known Member
Scrapping that idea. It would be fun to try if we ever restarted with a full 12 committed guys.
Going 2 conferences again.
Either split even
or
top and toilet
Walter323
Well-Known Member
Get the shit done from your phone quick
Akecheta
Well-Known Member
DONE!!!!!
Walter323
Well-Known Member
Very nice.
Walter323
Well-Known Member
A hybrid version where conference assignments are just alternated by record wouldn't be bad.
Texas 14-0
Tennessee 11-2
Arkansas 11-2
Nebraska 9-4
Iowa State 8-5
Cal 4-8
Ohio State 13-1
Georgia 11-2
Baylor 10-4
Alabama 9-4
UCLA 5-7
Notre Dame 4-8
Or just put 12 team names in a hat and pick them.
Or SEC+Texas vs the World.
Just throwing some ideas out there.
We are ready to advance @Walter323
I'm more thinking along the lines of mixing up user opponents year to year so we aren't always playing the same 5 guys plus 2-3 opposing division teams.
Otherwise I like something geography based like SEC+Texas (UT and Baylor) vs the world or something that just keeps natural rivalries in place.